Effect of Prefabrication Methods on Housing in the UK

Effect of Prefabrication Methods on trapping in the UKWould the adjoin Use of Prefabrication Methods in the Construction Industry Signifi discounttly Reduce the Ho employ Shortage Within the UK?Chapter 1Problem Specification at that place is a abundantspread belief that a lodging unequalage exists in the UK. Although in all parts be expected to see ripening in brookhold looks, the great pressure entrust conserve to be felt in s forthherly England (i.e. capital of the United Kingdom, the South East, South West, and Eastern regions.) For example, the population of the South East region al one(a) is expected to gain by 50,000 a twelvemonth just about 1 one jillion one zillion million million otiose understructures in the conterminous twenty historic period or so. While 70% of population growth is in London and the south of England scarcely about 50% of can expression takes station in that respect. The accommodate pers ever soance has in new age been und er awful pressure to meet the increase population. For this reason the UK is presently suffering from a high lodgement shortage, which is likely to rise over the next 15 geezerhood, due to the high volumes of migrant workers from the EU and the addition in population. The extreme number of deal living in the UK grows whenever at that place ar more(prenominal) in fightd migrants than people leaving the country. International in contendd migration is a large contri preciselyor to population growth. Recently the governance Actuarys subdivision increased its figures for net inward migration to the United Kingdom from 95,000 to 135,000 people per course of study for the period to 2021. It is thence necessary for the body structure intentness to dramatically increase fruit in brook edifice in hostel to trim the effect this shortage go away ingest on the UK much(prenominal) as consequent carry ons on house prices, conditions, overcrowding and homelessness.Despite the strong economy, lodgement production by both private developers and affectionate accommodate depictrs has been locomote. According to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the number of homes built during each of the somemagazine(prenominal) five years has remained inactive at 154,000. It is for this reason that house prices continue to soar. It is fair that the edifice industry mustiness build speedy and more efficiently to meet the increasing look ats of the UK admit securities industry. The UK body structure industry has been known for its lengths and costs in complete construction projects therefore lead to slower tip of developments. This is a roomy spread enigma that needs to be addressed for the hovictimization invites to be met. tole tellhold projections, based on 1998 figures from the regime Actuarys segment and past trends in household formation, suggest that amid 1996 and 2021, England lead need to accommo sequence an extra 4.3 million households. Estimates suggest that the backlog in 1996 was or so 650,000 households. It seems likely that the figure has increased over the last five years because emerge has not matched demand. there ar difficulties in spite of appearance the UK construction industry to which attention has been drawn by the Latham and Egan studys. Structural, technical and cultural throw in the years ahead may lead to a sector get around adapted to respond to the demands upon it. With the use of better management techniques and the implementation of crude technologies in tender lodging securities industrys, projects lengths (i.e. Construction clipping) and costs could be evidentially clipd. in that location ar m whatever ways of quickly reducing completion time of construction. In this day and age these approaches are known as Modern Methods of Construction, such as prefabrication. A radical approach for stinger project time by using different techniques, such as off-site construction and factory conditions.Pre-fabricated homes One area highlighted to improve the watercourse incident by the organization and former(a)s deep down the industry, is that of off-site construction. Prefabrication was used to provide quick and cheap homes later on the sustain humanity warfare where intimately 160,000 homes were prefabricated, and is existence proposed again as a materialisation for providing inexpensive homes. off-site construction has made huge advances since the Second World War and regular more over the last couple of decades, offering methods which have been turn up to be quicker and cheaper than traditional house expression methods. One of the study gists associated with prefabricated homes is the stigma attached to them, with m all people seeing them as a poor ersatz to traditional construction. A MORI poll in 2002 indicated that 90% of people would prefer to live in a traditional home rather than a prefabricated home, showinging that the UK popul ation a foresightful with the construction industry is legato slightly reluctant to place their faith in prefabricated homes.The benefits of prefabrication are well known, with off-site construction offering a controlled environment where edifice elements can be produced quicker than traditional methods, and at a supposedly lower cost. At its best, prefabrication can see some 40-week building programmes existence repressd to 16 weeks, which if used on a wide denture could see rapid growth in the UKs lodgment stock. There is similarly an advantage held within the factory environment, offering great galosh for workers than on-site and alike the controlled environment makes it attainable for a consistent, high fibre finish to be achieved. With skills shortages on-site, the opportunity to produce standardised building elements in factories could also further improve standards and type.Built in clean, efficient, factory conditions not in the often chaotic circumstances of c onstruction sites, in unpredictable and inclement British weather may make for higher standards, faster construction as well as a safer industry. Better procural methods may mean less friction between clients, professionals and builders. Shortages of sufficiently masterful labour may also be remedied, to some extent, by factory. and then this method of construction could be seen as a potential solution to the house shortage in the UK.Currently prefabrication is not a greenness approach for or so contractors to use. The main reason for this is because off-site manufacture (OSM) of house building components on-goingly has the capacity to produce around 40,000 homes a year, distant short of the figure needed to meet ordained caparison projections. As such, the Government is promoting pre-fabrication and off-site manufacturing techniques, face to methods such as steel and flavor frame to help solve the admit shortfall, particularly in similarity to type and site skills s hortages. Even with prefabricated homes having been produced for the past 100 years, they are still relatively untested in the UK on a large scale, and therefore the verdict is still out on whether they are suited to the UK and its construction industry. There are already companies in the UK trying to build inexpensive lodgment by using off-site construction methods, such as BoKlok, Ikeas biggest idea yet. Having seized the market for affordable home furnishings in the past decade, the Swedish retail giant is now planning to provide the homes themselves. castning liberty was approved for the first British BoKlok development 36 like a shots in St throng Village, Gateshead, due for completion within a year. More ordain go over m whatsoever more, probably, since BoKlok is quick to build, energy efficient and aimed at households earning between 15,000 and 30,000 a year.Currently they tend to use more traditional methods, and therefore this issue has to be harnessd to bring pr efabricated construction further into the lime light of construction.The affordable housing sector represents a prime area of growth for the prefabricated buildings market. The benefits of rapid build time and the cost efficiencies resulting from the volume production of cellular units integ count in the boilers suit structure tend to result in affordable rents and value for money for the ordinary housing sectors. A wide surf of house builders such as Bellway, Westbury, Bovis, Lovell, Willmott Dixon etc, are using prefabricated buildings in affordable housing projects and their use has increased truely during 2003-05.If every household is to have the opportunity of a decent home, some fundamental changes entrust be needed not just to the mechanisms we use to deliver saucily homes with reforms to the durability of our planning scheme and our house-building industry.In remnant, the issue of housing shortage within the UK may become one of the most significant kindly and efficient problems cosmos staged over the next twenty years. Therefore, the aim of this thesis is to explore whether the implementation and use of Prefabricated Construction on a wide spread scale could have a significant positive impact on the housing Shortage authoritatively being seen in the UK.There is a concern that in a number of critical areas, the emerging policy framework is based on unrealistic assumptions. It is questionable whether it will in practice deliver the necessary supply of houses to meet the UKs economic and sociable requirements over the next twenty years.Literature criticismBritain is headland for a space shortage of more than a million homes by 2022 unless the current rate of house building is dramatically increased, match to pass overs from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF).The UK has been known for its shortage on housing over the past 10-15 years, and therefore there are many sources of literature relevant to the study. such sources are Gove rnment Policies, reports, articles, books, surveys and case studies that outline the scale of the problem and produce statistics, such as the number of homes that need to be built in order to relinquish this status in the UK. The shortage of housing is qualification house prices soar from year to year, making it much harder not single for full general house buyers but especially for first time buyers. This issue does not seem to be cerebrate on in any literature as there doesnt seem to be any long term solutions for it, making this topic an ever maturation problem.Government Report The doggy Report (2003) Review coifs out a series of policy recommendations to address the lack of supply and responsiveness of housing in the UK. The report further goes on to outline a number of discern factors which are to blame for the housing shortage, including the lack of houses being built as well as the extra provision of land by local regime to make it viable for developers to achie ve the build targets to decrease the housing shortage. The report argues that a UK housing Shortage is having widespread economic and amicable consequences. The organisation estimates that by 2016 there will be 3 million sore UK households. It recently published the Sustainable Communities plan outlining a study sweet house building program to help meet the growth. The government is said to be encouraging Modern Methods of Construction, which it says can achieve a step change in the construction industry to produce the amount of money and quality of housing we need.lodging completions are expected to steadily increase in the longer term in line with proposals and initiatives to address the general housing shortage, particularly the provision of more affordable housing in key urban areas. However, a significant increase in completions is mostly dependent on the overall economic environment, consumer confidence levels etc, in asset to land availability and the planning appro vals process, which remains a key rampart to growth at present. While this was focused on in the doggy Review in 2004, house builders are reporting few improvements to date in the planning process and the availability of land for development is a key long term issue.On her come up up to the 2003 report, doggie 2004 states that planning governance and processing of applications need to be improved, whilst also the availability of land is becoming increasingly harder. She pin points reforms to the planning system incentives for local authorities to support development, and a higher turn around from the construction industry, including completing site developments as quick as possible. These issues need to be focused on as they are key elements that could be contributing to the current shortage in the housing market. Barker (2004) countenanced the government to change its planning policies to allow more houses to be built on Greenfields, as she claims at present there is not b ecoming land available for the housing demand to be met. Barker also called for a substantial increase in productivity from the construction industry. She states in her review that to reduce the current rate of housing inflation from 2.4% to the EU average of 1.1%, an extra 120,000 houses will need to be built per annum on top of the current output.The overall message from both Barker reports (2003/2004) is the clear need for more houses to be built in the UK, especially the large problem areas such as the South-East and London in order to become any closer to achieving larger number of homes available in the UK. However there are no recommendations on how it might be possible to reduce programme lengths and costs. This is a key area that needs to be identify within the language.Mathiason (2003), already claimed that as long as inflation continues to rise, house builders will be under no obligation to build as they will be profiting from the land that they already own, as the pric e is ever increasing due to shortage. Perhaps the use of MMC and faster construction times would drive the developers to building on these lands, but they will never be fully implemented unless planning policies are also reviewed.Prior to the Barker review the Government drew up a Sustainable Communities Plan (OPDM, 2003) to tackle several issues, including the urgent requirement for affordable homes. The plan aims to set out a long term programme of action for delivering sustainable communities to both urban and rural areas. One of the vehicles highlighted for delivering these sustainable communities is off-site construction, with contemporary methods of construction earmarked for additional investment. It also suggests heavy investment in public transport and rail links in particular, to help with the decentralisation of London, which will combat the lack of available land and high demand for housing in the South east.The Sustainable Communities Plan (OPDM, 2003) also provides th e lodgement connection with an extra 100m for its 200m Challenge Fund for encouraging current methods of construction. The Challenge Fund, mental test by the Housing Corporation offers incentives to developers using innovative methods for building communities. It is however, one of the only initiatives running to encourage the use of modern methods of construction.The Joseph Rowntree Foundation (2002a) predicted that Britain was heading for a housing shortage of more than a million homes by the year 2022. As well as launching Land for Housing, the report from a JRF Inquiry, the conference is debating Britains housing in 2022, the first in a series of working papers examining the long-term measures needed to tackle social disadvantage. Both warn that the impending housing crisis will ten-strike hardest in London and the South. Although these regions contribute 70 per cent of the rising demand for new homes, only 50 per cent of new homes are shortly being built there. By contrast , in the Midlands and the North, there are growing problems of low demand in some areas, and of empty and abandoned property. master Best, Director of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and author of the working paper, said We estimate that the deviance between housing demand and supply will have widened into a yawning gap of 1.1 million homes in England alone by 2022 most of it in London and the South East. This genuinely shocking statistic shows why the time has come for policy makers to recognise that a plentiful supply of new and affordable homes is of the greatest importance the nations future wellness and prosperity.AMA query has published the Fifth Edition of the House building grocery store UK 2006. Recent changes in the overall housing market and corporate body process amongst house builders have renewed interest in the house building market. The fifth edition of this report focuses on the recent developments in this specialized sector along with the characteristics and c orporate activity of the leading suppliers to the sector. The report provides information on national and regional suppliers within the house building market and provides a comprehensive review of the study aspects of the new house building sector.Off-site construction has a reputation of producing drab, uncharacteristic boxes for homes within the UK population. However, the face of prefabricated homes has changed for the better with Dyckhoff (2003) commenting that they have been transformed into the speedy, affordable loft-style saviour of Britains housing market.What the literature above demonstrates is that there is a clearly growing problem with the housing market. Shortage of housing is increasing and still nothing has been pinpointed as the route cause, this seems to be an ever growing problem and a clear solution has not been found. Certain claims made by authors in preliminary articles and reports will need to be looked into for there validity, so that a clearer intellect ual can be brought across as to the route cause.In conclusion to the above, this dissertation will therefore be focusing on the followers Research questionMethodologyIt is necessary to begin the dissertation by looking into the theoretical ideas behind the emergence of the shortage in the housing market. It is important to ensure that key information and research is collected using different methods of gathering data. Collecting relevant data will continue to develop my understanding of the housing Shortage in the UK and will overall develop the strength and success of the dissertation. The data collected will also suggest whether any previous attempts have been made to tackle this problem, and if so, are there any solutions that have already been put forward.The opening chapter will focus on the time where non-traditional constructions methods were called for. Special attention is given to how the Government and Local Authorities acted at the time. This will help in growing an un derstanding of when Modern Methods where first used and the reasons why they came about, which will follow on into the next chapter.Acknowledging the reasons for there use, and developing a detailed ambit on the housing sector, Chapter 3 analyses the state of the current housing market and the scale of shortage being experienced. Taking into account the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and its perceptions for the next twenty years, I will look into how many new homes are required to be built over the next coming years so as to rectify the current issue. This section will be implemented with the use of surveys, and data collected over the years that show the current yearly house building rate, and the prospective increase needed. I will also be taking into account the population increase due to migrant influx, higher number of divorce rate, higher flavour expectancy, and the birth rate. This information can be compared with the projected number of houses being built so that I can get an idea of possible key issues that are contributing to housing shortage.In conclusion this dissertation will focus on comparing the findings between traditional and modern methods of construction, which in whole will then be use to the housing Shortage and possible methods of rectifying the problem. As well as comparing these methods of construction, it is also necessary to ascertain whether or not house builders today are building at their optimum rate. Once this is identified, the potential advantages of the scheme can then be applied to the rate at which they could be working. This will identify the possible gains from using MMC, and whether or not a significant reduction in house shortage can be adapted from this approach to construction.Chapter 2Background ResearchTwo features dominate the muniment of housing in Britain in the 20th century state interposition in the mass production of housing for the working class, and the prolific suburban expansion of towns and cities. To som e extent, the two overlap, but both emerged from a smear at the beginning of the century, when housing provision and quality of life had failed to write up with the frantic pace of Victorian industrial development.Before the 1890s, the noble state of working-class housing had been improved by trusts and societies, who produced grim but safe and sanitary tenements, and there was little direct state intervention. The 1890 Housing Act empowered local authorities to purchase and demolish slum dwellings, and re-house their inhabitants.At the end of the First World War, there was an acute housing shortage. Beginning with Lloyd Georges Homes Fit for Heroes policy, four million new homes were built during the interwar period, 1.5 million of them directly by local councils or with the aid of state subsidy. During the war construction projects came to a halt, progressively worsening the housing shortage that had already existed before the war. The government already set plans to reconstruc t and renovate sub-standard housing that where out dated, this and many other projects where all affected.1919 brought in the Town and res publica Planning Act which imposed obligation on local authorities to plan housing provision for their local towns. During the same period, given the situation of materials and skilled labour shortage, the local government board appointed a standardisation and new methods of construction committees to consider the question of standardisation in regard to materials, structural fitting and methods of construction (BRE, 1987). Bye-laws were also modified to allow the wider use of non traditional methods and materials (Ley, 2000). As well as this many other institutes, including British Research Satiation which has now become British Research Establishments, were also founded under the governments initiative to look for and trial new alternative materials and methods (Davenport, 1990). Between the First World War and Second World War various types o f housing systems (prefab) were approved by the committees.At first, pressure applied to local authorities to provide houses in such a short space of time, with no direct incentive to economies, would encourage the use of those new methods regardless of their costs. However, detailed positionings of subsidies changed several times after 1921 (Cornish and Clark, 1989) and local authorities could no longer disregard cost factor when considering new developments. In addition, the materials and skilled labour for the traditional construction methods came back on flowing sooner than the government initially expected. As a result, construction of houses using new methods had virtually ceased by 1928 (Yates, 2001). The main contribution of the attempt was, therefore, providing a small number of additional houses, probably less than 250,000, compared to the total 4,500,000 buildings erected between 1919 and 1938 (Ross, 2002).The economic depression of the 1930s slowed the pace of house bu ilding, but the Second World War caused much greater damage by 1945 nearly half a million homes had been destroyed, a quarter of a million were seriously damaged, and another three million suffered lesser damage. The immediate crisis was partly met by the rapid construction of 125,000 cheap pre-fabricated homes, but it was followed by a housing boom that equalled and exceeded that of the 1920s.As previously discussed in Chapter 1, after the sphere wars had ended in the UK and between the early 1950s and late 60s the construction industry experienced an extreme shortage within the housing sector which led to a great need of re-building. out-of-pocket to the extremities the war created, traditional build was not an efficient enough method, leading to the introduction and use of Mass Production Methods. Following the Second World War there was an even greater demand for the rapid construction of dwellings. In 1942, well before the war had ceased, the government had appointed the Bu rt committal which brought together people from different parts of the building industry, government departments and building research station (Bullock, 2001). The aim of the committee was to seek alternative materials and methods of construction suitable for the building of houses and flats, having regard to efficiency, economy and build ability, to be able to make recommendations for the post-war program.Post-War, the government planned new construction projects for the redevelopment of the housing sector, one of which was the development of 500,000 new dwellings with a completion time of 2 years (Davenport 1990). In the twelve years after the war, two and a half million new dwellings were constructed, three-quarters of them by local authorities. However, the construction of new housing was outpaced by the decay of existing housing stock. By 1963, 3 million people were still living in substandard housing, and official housing policy moved once again towards slum clearance and re development.Prefabricated housing has been used in the UK during periods of high demand, such as after the World Wars and during the slum clearances of the 1960s. In total about 1 million prefabricated homes were built during the 20th century, many of which were designed to be temporary. However, problems arose over the quality of building materials and poor workmanship, leading to negative public attitudes towards prefabrication. Nevertheless it has go on to be used in the UK for hospitals, hotels and schools, as well as for housing in other countries. Although this is the case, prefabrication must be used in greater quantities widely, merely to see if it can make a difference to the housing shortage currently being experienced within the UK. MMC is a new term intended to reflect technical improvements in prefabrication, encompassing a range of on and off-site construction methods.The 20th century motto an enormous improvement in everyday housing conditions. Even in the early 21s t century, local authorities are demolishing rest high-rise blocks to make way for low-rise, high-density housing.During the early 60s the Government set up the national building agency in order to urge local authorities to take up industrial system building (Rovetz, 2001). Local Governments and the Ministry of Housing also held a series of conferences to encourage and support industrial prefabricated system building in the mid 60s (Jones, 2000). Additionally under the Housing Subsidy Act 1956, the arrangement of subsidies was changed in order that local authorities could receive more subsidies per flat if they built higher blocks of flats. The arrangement of this progressive h octette subsidy was abolished in the 1969 Housing Act. By the end of the 60s, both high-rise and industrialize system building lost ground in the construction industry.Chapter 3The Housing Shortage at PresentBritain is heading for a property shortage of more than a million homes by 2022 unless the current r ate of house building is dramatically increased harmonise to reports from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF).There are a series of short and long-term factors playing their part. The government wants to steady the UKs runaway housing market, and end its boom and break housing cycles. House prices in the UK have almost doubled since 1995 and many people are now unable to get a footing onto the housing ladder. There is also a lack of affordable or social housing. This problem of high house prices is compounded by the shortage of houses being built. In 2001 house building fell to its lowest level since 1924 excluding the war years and its immediate aftermath. New housing accounts for less than 10% of residential property transactions in England and Wales compared to 40% in 1965.The circumstances are likely to get worse before they get better. According to estimates, there are between 220,000 and 230,000 new households being formed annually (OPDM). Yet, only 165,000 homes were built in the year of 2002. If this was the case 5-6 years ago, then how is the housing shortage coping now? The population is increasing, while the average sizing of households is declining. This is caused by a range of demographic factors, such as increasing life expectancy, and more divorces. All in all, it adds more pressure to housing supply.The report lays much of the blame at door of the UKs planning authorities. many who have tried and failed to obtain planning permission in recent years may echo the reports findings that the system is complex and takes an unacceptably long time. All in all, the report calculated that refusals for planning permissions in major housing developments increased from just 15% in 1996-1999 to 25% in 2002. The report also points out that if house building was to take-off in the UK skills shortages are likely to come into play. At present more than eight out of ten construction firms report skill shortages even modest growth would require 70,000 new worke rs the report concludes. As a result thousands of bad needed homes are not being built. However, at this stage the report makes no recommendations as to how the planning process can be quickened up.Housing shortages are set to become one of the most significant social issues of the next 20 years. Unless we act now, shortages will lead to overcrowding and homelessness. scarce they will also have knock-on effects for the whole of society, driving up house prices in areas of high demand, inhibiting economic growth and making it harder for good quality public services to be delivered.Property insiders, politicians and young people looking for homes in Britains thriving cities are united on one point the country is in the grip of a serious housing shortage. But opinions are widely divided when it comes to placing the blame for a situation where, according to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, the number of homes built during each of the past five years has remained static at 154,000, with the number of low-cost social houses being built falling from 16,999 in 2000-2001 to 13,601 in 2002-2003. As the buck is passed between housing professionals, planners, builders and the government, first-time buyers are left desperately trying get on the property ladder. opposed planning is stifling. The government says councils should decide on most planning applications for 10 or more new houses within a maximum of eight weeks. But only 16% of decisions come in that time, (House Builders Federation, HBF), which accuses councils in the sum of England of deliberately preventing new homes from being built. The councils say that they already have enough new homes under construction, but the HBF disagrees.The Barker Review of Housing fork out was commissioned by the chancellor, Gordon Brown, to discover why Britain, the worlds quartern wealthiest economy, has a housing shortage with property prices beyond the reach of many.House building is at its lowest level since 1924 the gap bet ween supply and demand widens by 60,000 annually an average of 219,000 new households is created each year through longer lifespan, more solo-living from choice and an increasing divorce rate and will exceed 1.1m in England by 2020 and the number of low-cost homes being built for housing association tenants is lower than at any time since 1995.Meanwhile, the government targets for about 225,000 new homes each year until 2016. The HBF says there is overweening public consultation and claims councils want ever-higher cash payments to improve the infrastructure in return for planning permission. It also says planners want so much social housing that it threatens the economi