What Is the Point of the House of Lords?

What Is the Point of the domiciliate of Lords?The habitation of Lords is a fundamental part of the UKs bicameral legislative system, being an withdraw check and balance to the theatre of operations of Commons in legislative matters. However, this has been brought into indecision after the Recent Welf are Reform rouse.This essay aims to examine what is the conduct in the hearth of Lords? It will freshman look into its history, then its share in fan tan and how it has changed all over while. It will focus on the offbeat reform bill and the ban on hunting with hounds as its principal(prenominal) models.The residence of Lords are similarly called the Upper Chamber and are a part of the legislature. Legislature is the part of governing body that discuss and pass laws (J sensations, 2010). It is call for up of the Commons, Lords and the Queen, completely the Commons are elected. The executive is the society in mightiness and is responsible for implementing the laws a nd policies do by legislature (Jones, 2010).The signals of fantan are divided up into twain parts, the family line of Lords and the abide of Commons. The House of Lords is one of the two chambers of HM Parliament. The House of Lords is the second chamber of Parliament and is also called the Upper House (Jones, 2010). The House of Lords is separate to but whole kit and caboodle alongside the elected House of Commons. The House of Lords are made up of inherited Lords and Life fellows. Modern Lords are found by the PM. The appointed peers tend to go for a specialist area of knowledge, for congressman wellness or education. The House of Commons is made up of elected members (Budge, 2004). The House of Lords has 736 members, 86 more than the House of Commons. There are solitary(prenominal) 92 hereditary Lords left after they were thrown proscribed by the childbed Government in 1999 as it was deemed undemocratic (Knight 2010).The first part of the House of Lords is the remain ing hereditary members, the second part are appointed by the Prime Minister and they are given their titles, for example Lady Margaret Thatcher so as she was given the title by the Prime Minister who in like mannerk over from her she had a seat in the House of Lords. The leash part is made up of the court system and the church and people in positions of expertise (Monroe, 2002). Before taking a seat in The House of Lords the peer has to swear an oath of allegiance to the monarch (Jones, 2010). The House of Lords is a combining of tradition and modern legislature (Monroe, 2002)Laws are only made if the Commons, Lords and the monarch slew agree. An un create verbally constitution (a convention), states that the Monarch has always got to agree to smart laws made by Parliament. The Lords can also only suggest amendments overly legislation but does not actually watch the power to denounce the changes, meaning the Commons hold the power (Budge, 2004). The legislative process star ts with the packive service papers, white and green papers. They are published to allow consultation from interest parties such as professional bodies and voluntary organisations before the bill is introduced into the House of Commons (Jones, 2010). They gain their first requireing in which it is just read out and then a second version where there is a debate and a vote to move on to the committee pegleg which is pre-legislative scrutiny where the pen bill is considered by a departmental select committee this allows the MPs and members of Lords to begin an early influence on the woodpecker (Jones, 2010). In the committee stage they vote for amendments and send it to the report stage. In the report stage they discuss the amendments they then go to the Third reading which in the House of Lords.The key pur tick of The House of Lords is voting on whether to accept or close out legislation drawn up by The House of Commons (Jones, 2010). Suggesting amendments to legislation dra wn up by The House of Commons and debating legislation drawn up by the House of Commons, they can also introduce new laws to be debated. Although the important laws start the legislative process with the Commons, the House of Lords do draw up some legislation, for example ensuring children with special needs and disabilities have access to mainstream education or defend the right to legal aid in welfare cases and insisting on equality of the NHS treatment for physical and mental illness (www.parliament.uk).Members spend approximately half their time in the House considering draft laws. All bills have to be considered by both Houses of Parliament before they can go away law (Jones, 2010).The House of Commons send legislation to the House of Lords, in the form of the white paper, but the 1911 answer has taken away the susceptibility for The House of Lords to stop legislation sent down by The House of Commons. This started when the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lloyd George, sugges ted in 1909 the introduction of the first old age grant and a majority of the Lords voted against (Knight, 2010). The main purposes of the conduct was 1) The House of Lords can only delay a money bill for one month, and 2) Limiting the time the Lords can delay a bill, meaning if it was rejected 3 propagation the Bill could receive Royal Assent without approval from The House of Lords (Gillespie, 2013.) This has only been used four times in the last twenty louvre years. One of these was to pass The Parliament spell of 1949 which was an amendment of the 1911 Act making it so the Lords could only reject the bill two times rather than three before it could be passed with Royal Assent (Gillespie, 2013). These Acts took a bargain of power away from the Lords.The current PM is allegedly preparing to use the Parliament Act for the first time in ten years to push by the EU Referendum Bill into Law before the next election (Holehouse, 2014). The Act is sometimes described as the nucle ar option of parliamentary to tick off stalemates surrounded by the Commons and the Lords (Holehouse, 2014). An MP was quoted saying It shows that they really, really want it to happen. It also shows the Lords that they cant mess with it.Although the Lords have been stripped of a plentitude of their power, there are advantages to the Lords. There can be a fix more individual expression in the House of Lords (Knight, 2010). Many of its members have a lot of love in different areas of life with this experience making an important contribution to the progress of legislation and serves to caution the disposal of the day (Jones, 2010). The House of Lords are also responsible for holding government to account. Members in the Upper Chamber scrutinise the work of the government during inquiry time and debates in the chamber. In the 2012-13 session, members held the government to account with 7,324 oral and written questions and 193 debates on issues ranging from child poverty to immi gration (www.parliament.uk).The Lords can also middle of the roader the Commons using their expertise and making sure nothing too radical is put through (www.parliament.uk). Peers have less to lose, being exhaust thinkers. If an MP was to go against their party leader then they could be disregard when looking for a job although some do nonetheless have party affiliation and will vote on side of their party (Knight, 2010). Some people however, would argue that having the House of Lords is healthy for our system as it means it isnt led by political machines with party agendas (Knight, 2010). hit ponging is the toing and froing of amendments to Bills in the midst of the House of Commons and the House of Lords. A good example of this is The Hunting with Hounds Act which experienced seven years of ping ponging between the two houses. Three private members Bills were introduced by Labour MPs between 1992 and 1995 to ban hunting with no success (Garnett, 2007).However, in a 1997 pron unciamento Labour offered a free vote on the subject. In 1998 the Bill got its second reading in the Commons and was talked out by the third reading (Garnett, 2007). In 2000 a new bill was proposed with a agree of hunting with a licence, this was rejected by the commons and thrown out by the Lords. The Bill had been introduced too late to meet the terms of the Parliament Act of 1949. After Blair was re-elected in 2001 the ping pong effect still continued, with the Commons passing a new Bill and the Lords rejecting it, until 2004 when the conditions of the Parliament Act 1949 had been met and the Bill was given Royal Assent (Garnett, 2007).The House of Lords Reform draft bill was introduced in 2011. The Reform wants to outline the powers and responsibility of the relationships between the two houses. This would define the point of monetary privilege. This could be hard to electron orbit an agreement on when it could be rejected and what kind of amendments the House of Lords could make before they were wrecking amendments and what circumstances the Lords would be able to reject collateral legislation (draft house of lords reform bill report session 2010-12, Vol. 1 field).Originally Financial Privilege was seen as something dealing with Bills dealing with put up and taxation. However in the recent reform bill it was used to reject a lot of the amendments by the Lords and to preclude the bill ping ponging. The financial implications were seen as big enough by the Speaker to grant financial privilege (Crampton, 2012). Financial privilege is being used a lot more reducing the effect of the Lords scrutiny.Despite the fact the House of Lords do not appear to hold much in the way of power, the House are specialists in different fields offering expertise advice. Also, peers do not have a party agenda and therefore pose employability risk in going against their party. This is useful as these limitations can prevent any radical changes in law. But without any powe r to have their amendments noted there is really no point in the House of Lords if they can be over ruled completely.Budge etal (2004). The New British Politics. 3rd ed. Essex Pearson program line Limited.Crampton, C. (2012). Whats the point in the house of Lords?. Available www.totalpolitics.com/ intercommunicate/293317/whats-the-pont-of-the-house-of-lords.thtml. Last accessed 6th Jan 2014Egawhary E. (2010). What is the new face of the house of commons. Available http//news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8672770.stm . Last accessed 6th Jan 2014.Garnett M (2007). Exploring British Poitics. Essex Pearson grooming Limited.Gillepie A (2013). The English Legal System. 4th ed. Oxford Oxford University Press.Jones etal (2010). Politics Uk. 7th ed. Essex Pearson Education Limited.Knight, J (2010). British Politics for Dummies. West Sussex John Wiley and sonsPeele G (1995). establishment the UK. 3rd ed. Oxford Blackwell Publishers Ltd.What the Lords does. Available http//www.parliament.uk/busin ess/lords/work-of-the-house-of-lords/what-the-lords-does/. Last accessed 6th Jan 2014.Munroe, T (2002). An Intoduction to Politics, Lectures for first year students. 3rd ed. Mona Kingston 7, Jamaica Canoe Press.Holehouse, M. (2014). David Cameron prepares nuclear option on EU referendum. Available http//www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/10526825/Cameron-prepares-nuclear-option-on-EU-referendum.html. Last accessed 6th Jan 2014 write house of lords reform bill report session 2010-12, Vol. 1 Report.Y8158485